Blog

Comparing SEO and GEO

GEO vs SEO: what is the difference and which do you need?

SEO is about ranking in the results list; GEO is about being mentioned and cited in the AI answer. We compare the two and show how they reinforce each other.

The short answer

SEO (Search Engine Optimization) aims to rank a website as high as possible in search results. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) aims to make a brand appear and be cited in the answers of generative AI systems. They are not alternatives: good SEO is the foundation of GEO, but on its own it is no longer enough.

The key differences

Aspect SEO GEO
Where does it appear? Results list (blue links) AI-generated answer
What is success? Ranking, clicks, organic traffic Mentions, citations, position in the answer, sentiment
What does the system “read”? Pages, keywords, links Entities, relationships, quotable statements
How many winners? 10 organic results per page Typically a few brands per answer
How is it measured? Search Console, rank trackers Prompt-based monitoring across AI platforms

What stays the same?

Many best practices apply to both:

  • High-quality, expert content that answers real questions.
  • A technically sound website: fast loading, mobile-friendly, crawlable.
  • Credibility and trust: authors, references, real company details.
  • Structured data (Schema.org) that helps machine understanding.

What is new in GEO?

Quotability matters more

An AI model can easily cite you if your content contains concise, unambiguous statements. Answering in the first sentence, definitions, lists and tables significantly increase the chance that the model will pick up the information.

Entities matter more than keywords

Language models “think” in concepts and relationships. Your brand needs to be clearly connected to its core topics – both on your own site and in external sources.

External sources carry more weight

AI answers often cite third-party pages: comparison articles, industry portals, forums and reviews. GEO is therefore closely intertwined with PR and content marketing.

New technical signals

In robots.txt you decide which AI crawlers may access your site (e.g. GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot). An llms.txt file can give language models a concise, machine-readable summary of your website’s most important content.

Measurement is different too

In SEO, rankings and clicks are easy to measure. In GEO there is no “Search Console”: to know what AI says about you, you have to ask it the relevant questions regularly and record the answers in a structured way. That is why GEO analytics matters: mention rate, AI Share of Voice, sentiment and cited sources – tracked per platform and over time.

Which one do you need?

Both. SEO still drives significant traffic, and some generative systems rely on traditional search indexes. GEO ensures you are present when the user no longer clicks but asks the AI directly for advice.

Recommended order:

  1. Get your SEO fundamentals right (technical, content, structured data).
  2. Measure your AI visibility for the most important questions.
  3. Rework key content into a quotable format.
  4. Build external sources and measure the impact.

The AI Analytics GEO audit covers both and delivers a prioritised action plan.

  • GEO
  • SEO
  • search optimisation
  • Google AI Overviews
  • strategy